Hello, my friends. Today is February 24th, and this is Markets Weekly. So this week, I'm going to talk about three things. First, we have to talk about the global surge in equity markets, and of course, NVIDIA earnings that seem to have been a major contributor.
Secondly, let's talk a little bit about the Fed. So this past week, we got a lot of Fed communications, and it seems like the Fed is going to be marginally more hawkish going forward, but they're still going to cut rates this year.
And lastly, let's talk a little bit about private credit. So private credit is a growing asset class, but it's also pretty opaque. This past week, the Fed published some new research on private credit, and let's see what those findings are.
Starting with equity markets. So heading into this week, the big, big event, of course, was NVIDIA earnings. Over the past few weeks, NVIDIA has absolutely surged and has become a growing component in the major equity indexes and a major contributor to their positive performance year to date.
Now, everyone knows that we have this AI thing going on, and NVIDIA is a major benefactor. So NVIDIA earnings are going to be good, but it's always hard to know how the market will react. Is it going to be good enough? And if you look at NVIDIA's options activity, you can see there's a lot of people buying your low calls and a lot of people buying puts and how will those investors react.
So just a few days before, we had another related AI play, super microcomputers tank 20% in one day and heading into NVIDIA's earnings announcement, we also saw its share price leak lower. So at the earnings, it seems like the market really liked what it saw. And so NVIDIA surged over 10% after earnings.
If you look at their data center revenues, you can see what might be the cause for that. So NVIDIA's data center business is absolutely booming. Revenues are skyrocketing.
Now I recently heard a really good podcast on a lots with Sam Rines that might explain some of this. So Sam focuses on individual companies looking at things like earnings calls and their financial statements. And he noticed that a lot of companies are trying to increase volumes by investing heavily in advertising.
And what that means in practice is that a lot of money is flowing into the big platforms like Facebook and Google. And recall, not too long ago, Facebook had a blowout earnings and their stock rose 20%. So it seems like all these companies, these big tech companies are receiving a lot of advertising revenue and they are reinvesting it in the next big thing, AI.
And if you invest in AI, you got to buy a lot of stuff from NVIDIA. So what this earnings announcement, I think, tells the market is that this AI thing, it's for real, it's continuing, and there are some companies that are benefiting hugely from it.
Now, what the right price for NVIDIA's stock should be, I have no idea. But the market really liked what it saw. And so as NVIDIA stock surged and so the major indexes went up as well. And so we had record highs all across the board in major US equity markets. And if stock markets are making new highs, that's really bullish. But let's not just focus on the US. Let's take a step back and look across the world. In Japan, we have the Nikkei finally, finally making new all-time highs. The last all-time high it made was all the way back in the 1980s. But it looks like the Nikkei is surging into a bull market as well. Now moving to Europe, you can see the Euro stocks also making new all-time highs. So it looks like globally, globally, and most spirits are being unleashed. And maybe the crash up is resuming. We'll find out in the coming weeks. Okay, the next thing I want to talk about is the Fed. So this past week, we had a lot of Fed communication. And it was basically a marginally hawkish. Now, let's actually take a step back and see how things have been evolving.
So in December, we got a Fed.plot that guided towards three rate cuts this year. Now, since then, inflation data has basically uniformly come in notably hotter than expected and the economy has done better than expected as well. So they've been some concern as to whether or not that was an aberration or are we just going to re-accelerate and move towards a hotter economy. At the same time, if we look at financial conditions, it seems like they're loosening. So our Korean markets, of course, do well, but also credit spreads are narrowing and so forth. Now, what we heard, well, let's start with Governor Waller, very important. He gave a speech and the title of the speech basically gave it all away. Basically, he's suggesting that he's not in a hurry to cut rates.
Why? That's the case. Well, look at it from the Fed's perspective. On the one hand, full employment and price stability are its mandates. Full employment definitely taken care of, economies doing well, and inflation may potentially be higher than expected. And so what Governor Waller is saying is that the economy is doing well and we have this hot inflation plan in January. So I'm just going to wait for a few more data prints to see how the economy is doing, see how inflation is evolving before I make a decision. So he's not in a hurry to cut rates, but the assumption is that he is going to be cutting rates. Now, we also had an interview from President of the New York Fed, John Williams, who is also a very important person in the Fed. And of course, the title gives it away that he's still thinking about cutting rates and indeed, basically all Fed officials are thinking about cutting rates.
And if this is surprising to you, then I would really recommend you take a look at my most recent blog post or lay out how the Fed thinks about the world. Now, I would not make a mistake and confuse the Fed's mandate with the equity stock market, just because stock market is surging doesn't mean that's going to that the Fed has the high rates and so forth. The Fed's focus, of course, is full employment and price stability, not how high the S&P 500 is. And indeed, if you look at it historically, there might be some relationship between the stock market and employment and inflation, but it's very obviously not strong. So, John Williams, again, gives you the same view, what he's thinking about the world and, of course, he explicitly noted that hiking rates is not his base case. So, Fed speakers over the past month have basically emphasizing the same thing. They are going to cut rates, but they're not going to be in a hurry to do so. And so, with the Chair Powell taking the march off as a potential to thank for rate cuts, I think the most logical place is probably in June when we have another dot plot. And if you look at market pricing, you can see that market is finally on the same page as the Fed. Now, market is pricing in about three cuts this year. Just a few weeks ago, was it pricing in seven cuts, but it looks like, again, the market has been wrong and is moving towards the Fed's view of the world. Now, one other interesting communication we had the past week was the minutes. Now, in the minutes, again, aside from talking about the path of the overnight rate, the minutes had some interesting information on quantitative tightening.
Now, what I take away from the minutes is that there are, there's a number of people who would like quantitative tightening to continue for some time. Again, this is in line with the more marginally, marginally more hawkish view of when to cut rates. So, the minutes suggest that, no, we could taper totally, but one of the reasons to taper is not so much as to quickly end QT, but if we taper it, maybe go at a slower rate, maybe we can do QT for a longer period of time. We also had people who suggest, of course, that the Fed can cut rates and do QT at the same time, which is not new in which I have written about before. So, what the Fed is very clear on is that they're going to have a big discussion in March as to what house they should proceed with taper and QT and eventually ending it. So, the big details will come soon. But if March is when the discussion is happening, it's likely to be implemented sometime after March.
And so, in my own view, I think QT tapering probably starts in the fourth quarter of this year and can go on all throughout, deep into 2025. Okay, the last thing I want to talk about is private credit. Now, private credit is an asset class that has grown tremendously, but it's also opaque because it's private. And thankfully, we have some new research from the Fed that helps should light as to this segment of the market. Now, from a high level, if you are a company and you want to borrow money, there's a couple ways you can do this. Of course, one, if you are a big company like an Apple or something like that, you can go and you can borrow from the capital markets. You can float a bond and companies usually like to do this because rates are really low and have been over the past until recently.
We know we were in a zero interest rate environment, so it's been pretty cheap to go and just float a bond. Another way you can borrow market is to go to a bank. Now, if you are a medium-sized company, maybe you don't have a credit rating, maybe you are not as well known in the capital markets. So if you needed money, you would just go and call a bank and the bank can make a loan to you. But over time, of course, banks have become more highly regulated. And so they've been a lot more conservative in their lending. So what is your company? And you're not big enough to go to the market. And maybe the bank thinks you're too risky. What do you do? Well, what's been happening is that there's been a growing segment where you can just get a loan from a private lender. So this basically it would be let's say an investment fund that has cash from investors and then goes and makes a loan to you.
This investment company, this investor would not be a bank, so would not be highly regulated. But the loan wouldn't be something that you've flown in the market. It would basically be a private loan and hence the name private credit. So this segment of the market basically has been growing in part because banks have been more highly regulated. And so they are, I guess, not as willing to make loans to as wide an audience as before. Now, Fed data is showing that this private credit space has been surging in growth and right now has about $1.7 trillion. Now, a key characteristic of these private credit loans is that they tend to be bilateral. So it's one big investment fund making a loan to a foreign company one-on-one. They can quickly execute and they can negotiate a more of a customized agreement. Whereas if it were done with the bank, oftentimes it would be syndicated. You'd have a lot of people involved. Or if it's going to the bond market, you know, a whole bunch of people have a piece of it. In private credit, usually bilateral one big lender and one borrower.
So why would people want to be investing in private credit? Well, a big reason has been is that private credit, the interest rates are high. So investors are able to earn a high return in private credit than they could, let's say, buying a bond or even in leveraged loans. So that seems to have been a big driver in its growth. And if you listen to a recent podcast on Ford guidance on this topic, which is a good podcast, I recommend this episode, you can see that one of the big interests that investors have in private credit is also in that it's not marked market. And so if the market goes up or goes down, investors don't have to show that to their, okay, the investment management companies don't have to show that to their limited partners.
Now, another thing that was interesting in this Fed study is that private credit actually seems to have lower default rates than comparable assets, say, leverage loans. And part of this seems to be that these loans tend to be, you can, because they're bilateral, they're easier to renegotiate. And so there are fewer defaults. However, when there are defaults, it seems like the lenders have a smaller recovery percentage. Now, the study suggests that lenders in private credit have a smaller recovery, basically a greater loss given default, because a lot of the loans are collateralized by things that are just more intangible. So for example, if you make a loan to a big factory, that loan could be collateralized by equipment that can be resold.
But if you make a loan to something, let's say a tech company, well, it's collateralized by a lot of intellectual property, that's whose market value is a lot less certain. And so this, I think difference in collateral seems to be accounting for the lower recoveries. Now, one other thing I thought interesting about private credit is that loans are predominantly floating rate. And so if you look at a graph of their interest coverage ratios over the past several quarters, you know that they've been deteriorating notably. As the Fed has hacked rates, short rates have gone up. And so these private people who companies who borrow in private have been having, I guess, being squeezed. But the good news is that it's likely that the Fed will cut rates later on in the year. And so these guys, they should be receiving some belief. So all in all, it seems like private credit, and it'll continue to be fine. Interest cover ratios have gone down, but default rates remain low and rate cuts are come, rate cuts are probably help that out.
And now my this week, what I'm going to write about is how I think that the macro framework, let's say massive deficit spending on coming rate cuts is going to be also a boom to credit as it is to equity. And so personally, I'm not really worried about any credit concerns at the moment. All right, so that's how I prepared for this week. If you're interested in my recent thoughts, check out my blog at FedGuy.com. And of course, if you're interested in learning more, about markets, check out my courses at FedGuy, centralbanking101.com. Talk to you guys next week.