Hello and welcome to the History Extra Podcast from BBC History Magazine and BBC History Review. I'm Ellie Corthon. In the latest episode in our monthly series marking the centenary of the BBC, media historian David Hendy and Matt Elton have reached the 1960s.
Yes, I think that idea of it being poised between past and future really neatly sums up where the BBC is at the start of the 60s. The writer, EM Forster, said something interesting about broadcasting. He was actually talking about the third program, but I think it stands in a way for the BBC more broadly. He said it has two faces, one that faces the past and one that faces the future.
And also to put it slightly differently, a face that reflects and a face that explores. And I think that really captures where we are with the BBC at the start of the 1960s.
Just take the issue of multiculturalism, for instance. We've got the black and white minstrels which started in 1958, even then a kind of troubling kind of programme genre with dancers blacked up, drawing on that minstrel tradition. And by 1962, there were people inside the BBC already warning programme makers that this was an offensive programme. You've also just finished recently is Caribbean voices, which was a long running a radio series broadcast to the West Indies, which featured many, many rising talents, writers and poets from the Caribbean. You'd had dramas on TV like Man from the Sun in 1956, which offered a sympathetic portrayal of the experience of immigrants from the Caribbean. So in terms of multiculturalism, you've got a kind of a mixed balance sheet there.
Think about ITV and competition. So ITV had come along in 1955. By 1960, the BBC has responded to ITV. It's work in progress. ITV offered a kind of a faster-paced, brashier, less formal, less deferential approach to news, for instance. And the BBC was changing, it was featuring its newsreaders on TV in vision, not just their voices. Reporters were being less deferential. The presentation of BBC television was tightening up and becoming slicker in a way.
And then, of course, there's the turnover of staff, which is really important. You've got a generation of programme-makers who are reaching retirement, leaving the BBC, and you've got a new generation, university-educated, young men and women who are less deferential, more questioning. And they're kind of looking at a kind of changing society. They see a kind of society which is changing more broadly. And those changes are being played out and fought over in broadcasting. So people who want society to become more progressive and more permissive in art and culture and cinema and the portrayal of sex and the use of language and so on are kind of pushing into the BBC and trying to kind of shake up what broadcasting this kind of traditional domestic medium can do.
You've mentioned a few factors there. External pressure from young people, internal pressure from young people, commercial pressure. Was there a key factor among those that was particularly important, or which the BBC felt particularly sensitive about, or was this more a case of a confluence of factors all happening at the same time?
I mean, I think it is really a confluence, but age, the sort of, if you like, the generational kind of conflict which seems to be emerging, perhaps underpins a lot of them. So, yes, in terms of kind of youth, you've got a kind of flowering of a teenage culture for which you know, music is quite central. And although the BBC has right from the beginning been broadcasting music, including popular music, dance music, it's clear that in the early 1960s, it's not keeping up with musical taste. Musical taste is accelerating, it's changing, pop culture means there's always something new every week, every month. And the BBC is just not able to capture that.
In terms of competition, yes, you've got other television services, you've got ITV and the BBC has to respond to that. But actually, when you read accounts of program makers who were in the BBC in the late 50s and the early 60s, one of the phrases that leapt out at me was who Weldon, who said, we were in competition with ourselves. So, to some extent, we have to remember that there is an organic process here that is within the BBC, not just that turnover of staff, but the same staff who see their job as sensing the changes in society and trying to capture what is happening at any given moment.
Two other factors that I think are really important that perhaps you haven't touched on yet. One is, there's a new director general. Hugh Carlton Green is director general in 1960 at the very start of the decade.
Now, Hugh Carlton Green has been around in the BBC since the Second World War. He came in as a director of. the German service during wartime and was involved rising up the ranks through news and current affairs and external broadcasting through the 1950s and he becomes director general.
And in many ways, he's has dominating and influential figure on the BBC in the 1960s as Ruth was in the 20s and the early 30s. He's someone who sends out a message to his staff which is, let's throw open the windows, let's blow away what he called the ivory tower stuffiness and let's actually be ahead of public taste, not always behind it.
And at the same time, and this is the final crucial factor, I think, the BBC is actually well resourced at this point. It's got plenty of TV license fee income coming in. It's got a new television centre which opens. It's sort of feeling confident and it's feeling as if it's got the resources and the firepower to make good and exciting programs.
It would be great to talk through some of those programs, some of the ways in which this wind of change, if you like, actually impacted on particular genres, I suppose.
可以很棒地讨论一些节目,一些方法来说明这股变革的实际影响,尤其是对特定体裁的影响。
I mean, what were some of the key innovations in terms of satire and in terms of drama which were two of the big things that experienced change, I think?
“在讽刺和戏剧方面,有哪些关键创新是其中两个经历了变革的大事情,我想知道的是?”
Well, you mentioned satire and I suppose the preeminent example of that would be that was the week that was which launches in November 1962. It actually only runs for sort of two seasons.
So by the end of 1963, it's gone. So it has this sort of brief, extraordinary life that rides the wave of the early 60s satire boom. And what's interesting about it from a BBC point of view is that it's the BBC doing it.
到了 1963 年末,这档节目就停播了。它经历了一段短暂而非凡的生命,在 60 年代初期的讽刺热潮中一路狂奔。对于 BBC 来说,它有趣之处在于这是 BBC 制作的节目。
Old-fashioned aunties it were is part of the satire boom. And it's also that it was a kind of blend of news and satire. It wasn't actually the light entertainment department that made it. It was kind of news and current affairs people. And this mixing of news and entertainment was pretty new territory for the BBC.
And the style of the program as well, it was clearly anti-establishment, not necessarily progressive, but it was anti-establishment. And it seemed to be something that was by young people, four young people, a late Saturday night show.
David Frost was in his early 20s as the main presenter. You have Bernard Levin offering a Serbic interviews and commentary, Millicent Martin singing the theme song. And the studio setup is kind of cluttered and raw and chaotic.
David Frost 在二十岁出头时担任主持人。他获得贝尔纳德·莱文的讽刺采访和评论,还有米利森特·马丁演唱主题曲。而工作室的摆设有些凌乱、原朴和混乱。
So you know, when you're watching this show, you see the cameras moving around. You see the kind of lighting rig. You see the audience and so on. And it sort of captures this idea that it didn't want to be smooth. It was challenging the whole idea of Artifist. So it wasn't just about content. It was the kind of the whole style of that was the week that was that offered something new.
You mentioned drama. And I suppose again, the preeminent example of that would be the Wednesday play, which later turns into play for today when it moves from Wednesday. From 1964, you've got the Wednesday play, which draws on a wide range of of dramatists and styles, but perhaps becomes most famous for the kind of gritty realism tradition that you can see in other drama series like Z-Cars, that was something that was around and very influential.
And the Wednesday classic Wednesday plays I suppose would be up the junction in 1965 and Kathy come home in 1966, both directed by Ken Loach, who when he talks about those programs, he makes clear that he was deliberately setting out kind of intervene on social issues. In the case of those two dramas about abortion and about homelessness, so this was politically pointed drama. Now not like every Wednesday play or play for today was explicitly political as that.
As I say, it kind of offered a range of styles. But I think that captures the kind of the part of the new tone and the new feel. The really important thing to remember is there's always plenty of traditional stuff still around. And plenty of kind of as it were traditional or ethian uplift.
So at the end of the decade, 1969 you've got Kenneth Clark presenting civilization in a way the grand man's vision, a patrician vision of the history of western art. I mean a fantastic series, but deeply traditional in many ways.
And even some of those shows that we associate with the kind of the new pop culture like jukebox jury are actually kind of somehow very BBC. I mean, you know, David Jacobs, the presenter of this an avancular figure and a program that really was designed very much for the sort of the family audience rather than just the teenager.
So you know, throughout the 60s, in a sense we've got programs that are emblematic, not just of the kind of the new style, but of a BBC that's a mix, a jungle of the new and the old. This is really interesting. This idea of it being a jungle of the BBC existing somewhere on a continuum between its old traditions and these new forms, new ways of doing things.
How hard was it for the BBC and the people that were there to judge to what extent things could be pushed in these types of programs? And what sort of initial response were these new innovations and met with, I suppose? I suppose if you peer inside the BBC in the 1960s and you do that, I guess, looking at the records of things like the weekly program review board and all these editorial discussions, what you see is a BBC which is spending an almost infinite amount of time discussing these things and grappling with these things. And of course, there are no obvious answers.
Now you've got a director general in Hugh Carton Green who says this, he goes around and says to his senior staff, if you don't upset part of your audience most of the time, you're not doing your job properly. Now that's a real encouragement to take risks, right? But then you've also got this old continuing, wreathy, and idea that yes, it's okay to lead to be a head of public taste. But if you're too far ahead of public taste, you're going to leave the public behind. So there's always a measurement to public taste.
And if you look at the minutes of these weekly program review boards where all the senior program makers and heads of departments gather every week and chew over the programs of the week and the issues that arise, they use their professional instincts, but they also look at what the newspapers are saying. They look at the audience research, they look at the letters in the phone course they've received, and they blend all of these factors in to try and reach a judgment. But it's hard.
There was one person at a weekly program review board who said trying to draw the line in terms of public taste was like trying to draw a line in mist. And so, you know, just take the example of language. There were certain words that the BBC knew it either couldn't broadcast because they were too strong. Or if they were to be included, let's say in a kind of difficult controversial drama, then they were referable words.
In other words, you had to refer to your line manager and it might eventually go right up to the director general. Well, that's fine for the most extreme words. But what about bloody or damn and words like that that are kind of demotic words in common speech. And if you've got dramatists who want to reflect the world as it is, it's going to have to use words like that. Do you refer those? Do you exclude them? If you exclude them, won't the BBC sound a little bit pussy and old fashioned? If you include too many of them, will it just offend the audience so much that the audience is lost?
So there's no straightforward answer to this. And the BBC is aware that while it's got dramatists and writers and young program makers pushing in one direction, it's also got outside of the BBC, people like Mary Whitehouse, most famously, who is determined to take a stand and actually say, whatever you the BBC think you're doing, there is a silent majority as she would refer to it who believe that actually there's too much kitchen sink drama and not enough of the kind of cozy sitting room, if you like. So the BBC is just, I'm not sure if the BBC finds an answer to all this, but it's constantly aware of this issue and trying to kind of navigate some way through it.
Did the launch of BBC 2 in 1964 give the BBC new opportunities? And I suppose how did it view this new channel? I suppose in many ways BBC television having a second channel was rather like the creation of the third program in 1946 and what that did for radio in terms of creating a space where a few risks could be taken without necessarily undermining the effort of the main channel, what became BBC 1 whose job it was really to compete with ITV in terms of kind of the ratings battle, which was pretty ferocious for much of the 1960s.
Paragraph 1:
So BBC 2 was this blank slate if you like that could create space for experimentation, for trying new formats and he wasn't the first controller of BBC 2 but the controller for much of this period David Attenborough really sort of invented BBC 2 very much in his own image as a kind of Renaissance man. In other words, he wanted to kind of widen the range of subjects which could be tackled.
BBC 2是一个空白的板子,可以为实验和尝试新格式创造空间。他不是BBC 2的第一任控制者,但在大部分时间里负责人David Attenborough非常想创造一个文艺复兴式的BBC 2。换句话说,他希望扩大能够处理的主题范围。
Paragraph 2:
Archaeology had that been done on television? Well, let's have a go. Anthropology, let's do that. Sport, that's a bit tricky because existing channels have rights over certain sporting events and we don't want to undermine them. So what are we left with? Not very much. What about flood lit rugby? What about snooker? What about putting snooker on television?
Paragraph 3:
And the range on BBC 2 becomes kind of fantastically varied, even more. varied than perhaps on Radio 1. You've got, you know, Ken Flax, Civilisation at one extreme and then kind of modern pop shows at the other extreme and all and snooker in the middle. So BBC 2 kind of provides this sort of new playground for invention, if you like, in television where a few risks and can be taken.
BBC 2的节目类型变得非常丰富,甚至比Radio 1还要多元化。你可以看到肯·弗拉克斯的《文明》以及现代流行音乐节目,还有中间的斯诺克比赛。因此,BBC 2成为了电视界的新乐园,可以在这里进行一些冒险,尝试新的创新。
Paragraph 4:
But what also happens is that, you know, David Attenborough being a good BBC man has conversations with his colleagues who are running BBC 1 and it's a coordinated effort. So it's all part of one BBC and, you know, the idea is that there would be a kind of useful contrast between the two at given times and they coordinated in terms of programme junctions and so on.
Paragraph 5:
And of course the arrival of BBC 2 in a sense really helps the BBC in the ratings war. You know, they were equally poised. One BBC television channel and ITV and now the BBC has two channels and ITV just one. So it really helps again boost the BBC, gives it confidence. It's a kind of expanding, confident organisation at this stage.
Paragraph 6:
So the government takes action to close down the pirates but it realises there has to be some sort of legal alternative and it's the BBC that is lined up to provide this legal alternative and it emerges in September 1967 in the form of Radio One.
因此,政府采取行动关闭盗版,但它意识到必须有某种合法的替代品,BBC被选为提供这种合法替代品的机构,在1967年9月以 Radio One 的形式出现。
Paragraph 7:
Is it right to say that the third channel had become available as an idea and then the government decided to give it to the BBC rather than ITV? Is that how that worked? Yes, there was a government inquiry, the Pilkington Committee which sat and a third channel was up for grabs. It was by no means certain whether that would go to the commercial sector or go to the BBC.
Paragraph 8:
Although there were quite a few people on the Pilkington Committee, like Richard Hoggut for instance, who were kind of as it were more sympathetic to the BBC than to commercial broadcasting. Hugh Colton Green actually mobilised an extraordinarily kind of clever effort. He had been involved in some sort of what we might call Siox operation after the war and he knew how to kind of run a campaign and was very, very clever about kind of steering the Pilkington Committee towards the right conclusion which was to award this channel to the BBC. So yeah, the BBC were kind of, were pretty kind of clever about managing this. But the committee in a sense was veering that way anyway.
Paragraph 9:
You mentioned Radio One there, so we should move to Radio. What were the BBC's radio offerings in the first half of the decade and did they experience these similar sort of social pressures to change as the TV channels did?
Paragraph 1:
One of the great BBC radio figures who joined in the 1930s and actually retired left at the end of the 60s was Geoffrey Brideson, who made wonderful documentaries. And he described BBC Radio at the end of the 50s and the early 60s as quotes in the doldrums.
Paragraph 2:
And I mean his reason for saying that was partly the fact that he was still struggling to find an identity in a purpose with the rise of television. I mean, you know, more and more people watching television, especially in the evening, when which had been kind of one of Radio's traditional peak time.
Paragraph 3:
So Radio was having to adjust to being a kind of daytime medium. It was having to adjust to being a bit of a background medium. People didn't really any longer kind of sit down and sort of pay attention to the radio like they did to the television set.
Paragraph 4:
Radio is on in the kitchen or sometimes the bedroom. And increasingly later it would be on in the car. So was Radio doing the right thing? Were kind of elaborate set piece dramas and features and documentaries the right sort of thing? Or should Radio reinvent itself as a so-called secondary background medium?
Paragraph 5:
You know, it should be everything should be sort of short and manageable and digestible in short chunks. You know, three minutes of this and three minutes of that should radio stations be more predictable so that people knew what they were getting instead of a kind of rich mix on each channel.
Paragraph 6:
Should people know, well, if I tune into that, I'll get music and if I tune into that, I'll get speech or news and so on. So all these debates were happening. But beneath the surface there was constant change and evolution.
Paragraph 7:
Radio was becoming more informal. In the early 60s you've got again new people coming into the domestic radio services, people like Jerry Mansol, for instance, who'd come from the World Service and takes over the home program. And his keen on more informality, less scriptedness. He wanted kind of something that was a bit sparkier and more more spontaneous.
Paragraph 8:
With portable recordings and magnetic tape becoming kind of cheaper and more available, you've got more actuality, you know, recording spontaneously interviews rather than having to script things in the studio. So all of these changes are taking place.
Paragraph 9:
The biggest challenge in a way for BBC Radio in the early 60s was over music and needle time. And the simple reality the BBC came up against was that even if it wanted to broadcast more pop music, it wasn't able to.
Paragraph 10:
It was restricted to something like 30 hours total of needle time. In other words, the amount of recorded music on gramophone records it could play in order to kind of honour agreements with the musicians, unions and performing rights society and publishers and so on. Across all channels, across all its radio channels, 30 hours.
Paragraph 11:
So it was really difficult. It had a few pop music programs, you know, Brian Matthews was trying to do his thing on a Saturday morning and so on. But really there wasn't the capacity to reflect those cultural changes that we talked about, that kind of youth quake in musical taste.
Paragraph 12:
And then what was the key factor that led the BBC to think, well, we do need to have a pop music station in our offering? Well, of course, it's the radio pirates. The pirates, they flourish in the mid 1960s.
Paragraph 13:
So in Rage, Easter 1964 is when radio Caroline suddenly pops up on a kind of ship sailing around the British coast and within a short period you've got several pirate radio stations. It's interesting, existing on beyond the reach of kind of legislative authority.
Paragraph 14:
So they're not having to pay their dues to musical performers or publishers. They can play as much pop music as they want to and they have this amazing Buccaneer spirit and they have young presenters who are appealing to young listeners and millions of people are tuning in because the BBC is not offering anything for them and they're an extraordinary success but they are illegal and they are getting the UK authorities into trouble with the kind of in terms of its international obligations about wavelengths and security and payments and so on.
Paragraph 15:
So the government takes action to close down the pirates but it realizes there has to be some sort of legal alternative and it's the BBC that is lined up to provide this legal alternative and it emerges in September 1967 in the form of Radio One.
Paragraph 1:
Now Radio One is a BBC pop radio channel. It's a huge innovation but of course it's part of a more general shake-up of radio because up until this point we've got this pyramid of three services. We've got the light program, the home service and the third and overnight they disappear and they're relaunched as Radio One, Radio Two which really is the old light program, Radio Three which is the old third program and Radio Four which is the old home service.
Paragraph 2:
Cultural commentators in a way are a gog at this because the home service was regarded very much as the kind of the bedrock of the Rheathian BBC and yet here it was number. four, it seemed to be demoted in some way.
Paragraph 3:
Then Radio One, the number one position was this new upstart pop station and you know as one of the commentaries in the press put it, this was or appeared to be aunties first freak out. So it was a kind of it was a seminal moment I think in terms of Radio in this launch of a dedicated pop station.
Paragraph 4:
Who are some of the key figures and I suppose some of the key programs in this new Radio One, this new channel? Well before we talk about the presenters I think it's worth just flagging that the man behind it all in sense the controller who was Robyn Scott who rather like Hugh Carton Green was a kind of figure who'd been at the BBC for a long time.
Paragraph 5:
Robyn Scott the white tornado as he was called because of his kind of shock of white hair was someone who worked in the French service going back to the war time. So he wasn't a kind of he wasn't a young Turk. He wasn't he wasn't part of the youth quake as it were but he knew that his job was to recruit the kind of presenters who would reflect some of that bucconiering spirit and excitement of the pirates.
Paragraph 6:
So it was Robyn Scott who set about if you're like organising some some key bits of headhunting as the pirates were shut down. Perhaps the most important figure first of all was Tony Blackburn who was the breakfast show presenter on the new Radio One and he'd been at Radio London and was headhunted from from that and I mean in many ways he was typical of the daytime at Radio One, disjocke, he was kind of breezy, he was chatty, he was a little bit flirtatious as well.
Paragraph 7:
There was there was this notion that the presenters who were all at this stage men were sort of husband substitutes for the quotes the housewife audience. There was a lot of sort of stereotypical kind of thinking here but he was he was a consummate professional in terms of you know managing the studio and playing the records and so on and he loved it you know he loved the jingles he loved the chat and a perfect figure for the breakfast show in these early days.
Paragraph 8:
There was a saying that eventually emerged Radio One which was that it was this it was ratings by day reputation by night and so the idea of the daytime show was to be as popular and accessible and as bright and breezy as possible.
Paragraph 9:
You don't you don't need to be passionate or particularly interested in the music you just need to kind of share it with the audience but at night time and at weekends you've got more specialist presenters who are passionate fans about particular kinds of music and I suppose the most emblematic figure there is John Peel who joins again from Radio London where he'd been briefly presenting a cult program called Perthume Garden which was a kind of eclectic collection of all sorts of kind of music at the margins of of of of rock and John Peel had this sort of hippie-ish sort of cult style ready made off the shelf for Radio One he'd kind of developed it at the Perthume Garden but he'd also spent a few years in the states doing late night shifts on local radio stations buying lots of records immersing himself in the music scene so he was incredibly knowledgeable about music and he saw his job actually in very very very wrythean ways he might not necessarily have talked about wrythe but he described his task as you know making people aware of music that they might not otherwise have heard it's a classic wrythean ambition.
I suppose a third person who's definitely worth mentioning is Annie Nightingale now she's not there at the beginning in fact she tries to join Radio One she's a she's an experienced music journalist exactly the kind of person who you'd imagine Radio One would want but she's in a sense a very clear victim of the kind of sexism in terms of Radio One's recruitment policy this idea that presenters needed to be men because they were husband substitutes but in 1970 I think the BBC realizes that it can't sustain this position and so she joins Radio One and it's very much in that same tradition of John Peel of being a music enthusiast who who who sort of shares her passion and selects music carefully she's not just putting on the music that she's been told to play she's involved in that selection process and so right from the beginning you've got a Radio One which has this sort of central sort of flavor of kind of you know cheesy.
Poptastic music as it were but also has this sort of interesting activity at the margins which is much more experimental and radical and exploratory writing at the end of the 50s some commentators wondered whether broadcasting might help create a common culture in Britain as we reached the end of the 60s this out of the 70s had that come to pass I don't think it had I mean you know it was someone like Richard Hoggut for instance really hoped and believed that broadcasting had that ability to forge a common culture but there's another cultural commentator who's important at this stage Raymond Williams who famously says culture is ordinary it's part of everyday life and the reality was that everyday life showed that tastes in a way were diverging and that sort of class distinctions were just as embedded as they ever had been and that new distinctions especially that that one between age range you know the generational distinctions were becoming stronger so I think that the difficulty for the BBC is that actually you know culture as it were is sort of fragmenting and diversifying.
And the BBC's response in a way is the only one it could make which is not to force everything into a kind of middle brow that might be the average of all of these cultures but to kind of embrace and reflect this to this fragmentation this diversity so you know it doesn't it doesn't go high brow it doesn't go low brow it doesn't go middle brow it kind of goes wide brow in a way and and widens the range so yes you've got top of the pops and you've got Kenneth Clark civilisation and all sorts of things like that that stretch the range and underpinning that I suppose is an acceptance that not everything will be liked by everyone and that the kind of programs that need to be made do not need to please everyone.
And that's where I think we can see the importance of the key change in the BBC in the 1960s under Hugh Carton Green and through that generational change which is that progressive ideas if you like had percolated through the system it wasn't a kind of total revolution you've still got the traditional alongside the news but you've got this key idea which has taken root that broadcasting television radio doesn't any longer have to kind of think that everything that goes on air has to be suitable for everyone and that I think is a really important distinction between the BBC at the end of the decade and the BBC at the beginning of the decade that was David Hendy you can read more from David in every issue of BBC History magazine and his book The BBC A People's History is out now published by Prof. Carton Green.
在我看来,这就是在1960年代休·卡顿·格林领导下BBC关键变革的重要性所在,通过这种代际变革,渐进的思想已经渗透到了系统里。这不是一种总体性的革命,传统节目与新闻节目仍然并存,但是这个关键性的思想已经扎根了——广播电视不再需要认为所有上播的节目都适合所有人观看,我认为这是20世纪60年代末BBC和20世纪60年代初BBC之间一个非常重要的区别。 David Hendy是这样说的,您可以在BBC历史杂志的每一期中阅读更多关于David的内容,他的书《BBC的人民史》现在由Prof出版。卡顿·格林出版。
Thanks for listening this podcast was produced by Jack Bateman.