And I think the companies that will do well are companies or SaaS companies that are a system of record that have enough data within their products set, either from a product standpoint from a user or from a user standpoint, and utilize that data and make the experience better. So those are the companies that's going to do well. The companies that might struggle or even become obsolete are ones that don't have data. It's not a system of record, maybe a system of engagement, but I think those will be challenging, right?
我认为那些会做得很好的公司是那些拥有记录系统(system of record)的公司或SaaS公司。这些公司在他们的产品中拥有足够的数据,无论是从产品角度还是用户角度,能够利用这些数据提升用户体验。因此这些公司会表现出色。而那些可能会面临困难甚至淘汰的公司是那些没有数据的公司。它们可能是一个互动系统(system of engagement),但我认为这些公司会面临挑战。
Hi folks, welcome back to another episode of On Call Within Signia, where you go on call with leaders innovating the future of emerging markets around the world. And for this episode, we actually have a very special guest. It's our first guest from Japan. In recent years, we've been in Singapore, not just for national investments, but also since many of our companies have been expanding to that market. So really an important time to actually learn more about that market and we have no one better than one of the thought leaders in that market. And I'll have our co-host, England, introduce him. It's a pleasure today with a special treat. Mr. Afarasan, King Jia Sadar, who has become a good friend and also a co-investor and a good partner for us in Japan. He's a veteran in the venture capital space in Japan. And I would say definitely one of the top venture capitalists. I learned a lot from him and I think he can share a lot on the landscape in Japan. And I don't want to keep these things off with your decades of experience investing and building software companies across Japan and US. I love for you to introduce yourself and say a little bit about background and also share a little bit about one or two pivotal moments in your career as you develop as a partner, a great partner for Japanese entrepreneurs. Yeah, sure. I appreciate it. Just a quick background about myself. I started my career at a company called the Toto-Chu Corporation. It's one of the biggest trading companies here in Japan. Recently Warren Buffett, I think invested a lot, so there's been a lot of press around trading companies. And within that company, I was doing investments into US companies and helping them come to Japan. That was my primary goal. And then I was also seconded to a subsidiary called the Toto-Chu Technology Ventures, which is a corporate VCR that does mainly early stage investments in Japan. And that's when I fell in love with investing and I met a company called Merkari, which became the biggest tech IPO in Japan history. And I realized great companies that are founded with great products. Period, right? If it's not a great product, you have a great founder with a great background. It doesn't really mean anything. So product was what really realized that great companies are built. And then I went on to Salesforce to begin the Japan head. It was probably early days of SaaS in Japan 2015. Some people in Japan were calling it ASP, not SaaS. It means the same thing, but it was called differently. And I was like tweeting all day about SaaS. And I think the timing was right. Many companies were founded around 2012 and 2015, went on to become billion dollar companies. And those were company names of Samsung, Free, Vision, and in that I'm sure you've met some of these founders. And back then, these early toch I was using internal software built by a system innovator in Japan of the likes of Fujitsu and I think Hitachi. And I don't want to be sounding a little bit rude, but it wasn't an easy software to actually use. Expense management was a nightmare. I had to log in with a VPN sometimes when I was at the office. Even if you clicked on the forgot password link, you didn't get an automatic email reply. It would have to be overnight or the next day or something. So all around, it was a bad experience using enterprise software. Starting from like 2015-ish, there was a lot of modern software, SaaS software, and the business model came towards customers, right? Because if the customers were angry at the user interface or user experience, they would just cut it off and turn it to another SaaS offering, right?
As self-worth ventures, I learned the term because self-worth is the biggest SaaS company in the world. And I was part of a small team, but grew to probably about 20 people globally. I wanted to also go back to the time where you thought about starting one capital, which is now developing the world of preeminent new-ish and best-in-class, Japan-focused SaaS funds. Actually globally, I think globally, probably want to talk SaaS funds as well. So I wanted to go back and see what was the thinking behind starting the firm. And back ground from Hitachi and Salesforce ventures.
Several things, one from the market perspective. And SaaS penetration rate back at 2015 was probably less than 1%, but it was growing pretty fast. And even today, solar only accounts for about 4% of the enterprise I'd spend within Japan. So there's a lot of room to grow. That's one. The second part is that I was growing older. I was in my early 40s, and the founders that I backed back at self-worth, they were like, rast 206, macroi. One who just started growing your own fund. You've been with the corporate for over a decade. Why don't you start your own stuff? So I got a nudge from that. And thirdly, several experiences at SaaS force ventures was a big lesson for me in the sense that it was the corporate VC and an amazing one. But during that time, I had some issues doing follow-ons, even for the companies that was really performing and winning, strategic investment.
有几件事情,首先从市场的角度来看。2015年时SaaS的普及率可能不到1%,但它增长得非常快。即使是今天,太阳能在企业支出中在日本只占大约4%。所以还有很大的增长空间。这是一点。第二点是,我年纪渐长,当时刚过四十岁。我支持的一些创始人比如在自我价值的时候,他们像rast 206,macroi之类的创始人,问我:"你为什么不开始自己的基金呢?你在公司里待了十多年,为什么不创办自己的东西呢?" 这给了我一些启示。第三,在SaaS force ventures的几次经历对我来说是一次大课,虽然它是一个很棒的企业风险投资公司,但在那期间,即便是对一些表现和战略性投资很好的公司,我在做后续投资时也遇到了一些问题。
And when you strike the partnership initially with the initial check, you didn't really have to do a second fund check for an investment to solidify the partnership. We were trying to add more companies to the portfolio base and volumes were a little bit difficult. And I wasn't really being totally supportive for the entrepreneur, right? Because if the companies were performing existing companies, investors would just follow on, right? And I wasn't able to do that. That was also a big moment for me. And with that, big market, emerging market, I had entrepreneurs that was like, we'll back you with your first fund. And thirdly, I want to be a true partner for my entrepreneurs and make my own decisions and make my own risks. And that's how I formed one capital. That's great.
And tell us a little bit about, I thought one of the very interesting things about what capital was the digital transformation initiative. Can you tell a little bit more about this? Yeah. So our mission is to transform Japan and make it faster. And in order to do this, I think using the fund vehicle would be ineffective methods, right? And we have two lures, anchor LPs. One is called AZA. It's a pharma company. And my co-founder is a Boston consulting guy. And he has been transforming companies for decades, right? But he felt there was a challenge with the consulting model where you are contracted about three to six months or an extension of about 12 months in China, transform a company. You want to utilize the fund model where you have an LP that invests in your fund for about 10 years, right? 10 plus two years. And you have a lot of wrong way to actually help them transform. So with that angle, you know, the lowest companies in Japan are actually commanding a lot within the Japanese ecosystem from the economy perspective. So if you were able to turn these companies into strong software companies, that would be an angle to transform Japan. And the other one is our main business is the fund investments, invest in the next cell source in Japan and have them be installed in literally all the companies in Japan and fast track all of them. That's where I want to double click on this. so what do you mean to say is, other than being LPs, do you do join ventures then? Do you do spinouts or do insert startups into these companies as customers? It probably varies, but I love for you to elaborate a little bit more. Yeah, there are several ways to digitize a company. And one is for them to install digital products within there from internally. And our angry LPs are actively looking at our portfolio companies and adopting those services to become more competitive in their respective markets. So that's one. The second is to really sit down with them and help them put together a roadmap about how to become a digital company, like how Netflix became a DVD rental business to a streaming service. But mainly what we actually do is heavy consulting and also introduce our portfolio companies to them.
Fantastic. And I wanted to jump to another interesting innovation that one capital has done, which is projection.ai, which is a very interesting platform that you should share with the audience. I wanted to also see what's the biggest learning from the experience of putting this step up together and saw the interesting insights that you have gleaned in, but missing the demo is very impressive. I would urge all the listeners to check it out.
But yeah, as another son, this tells more. Yeah. So the thinking behind that was, I'm a software investor, right? But I've never built the software myself. And I thought in order to be better at investing, getting a better understanding of how to build software would escalate my ability to become a better investor, right? And also have stronger empathy towards founders. And of course, I read a ton of coaching books. I took coaching lessons and I try and always be empathetic. But at the same time, if you don't have that experience, it's really hard to emulate those kinds of characteristics.
So that's one. And secondly, I wanted to build software that was relevant to VC. And I think there's several aspects to that one, you need data. And especially enterprise software, there's a lot of data around. And I really admire the reports that Bessemer actually publishes and they have this Bessemer cloud index. So we have a same version of Japan called one capital cloud index. And starting off from there, we're like, why don't we put it put together a database just for SAS public companies.
And also the database is evolving to capture private SAS companies, data. And why don't we publish this on the web? And that would also benefit to SAS ecosystem, but also our founders that we backed. Because these founders that we backed are building products every single day and talking with customers. And this one, we really have time to log down to Bloomberg, right? Every single second. But Bloomberg is an amazing database, but it doesn't really cover just SAS, it covers everything, right?
So we wanted to build this database that was just focused on SAS. And I guess you took a look at it and happy that you like it. Just fantastic. I think you're very humble, but I would say the world of most impressive software platform that you build, especially comprehensive Japanese data.
So I would also now connect to your investing one capital. What would you say is your most impactful investment that you feel the most proud of either one capital would be prior to that. Tell us the story of how you met the founders and biggest challenge to the partnership. Yeah. Our one capital is pretty new. So we've got interesting companies in our portfolio. And those are like OVIST, Healthfield, and Knowledge Work. And we've got a bunch of them, which is emerging. They're still in the early stages, but in becoming middle to late stage companies right now.
那么,我想请你谈谈你投资于 One Capital 的情况。你认为你最引以为傲、最有影响力的一项投资是什么?请告诉我们你是如何与创始人们见面的,以及在合作过程中遇到的最大挑战是什么。
嗯,我们的 One Capital 还比较新,所以我们的投资组合里有一些有趣的公司,比如 OVIST、Healthfield 和 Knowledge Work。此外,我们还有一些正在崭露头角的公司,它们目前仍处于早期阶段,但正在向中后期公司发展。
The company that would raise from an impactful perspective that's already gone public is a company called VisionAll. And in England, I think you went to see the World Cup stock with him or something. Yeah, that's right. Minami said, no. My first interaction was when he was like just after he graduated from the building, the rock and baseball team. And he was thinking about starting a company. And he was thinking about maybe switching to a company. So he wasn't really sure. But when he shared with me the deck of BizReach, the matching platform, I was blown away.
I was in a VC then. I was trying to back him to my entity, Eddy Tortu. It wasn't successful. And I regret that since that day. And I've been a close friend and had a relationship after that in initial discussion. And then I went on to become the Japan have self source, and then I backed him there. And it's a very unique company where she raised a little, just a small amount of money, built a business, sold it, and used that as fresh cash to fund his business matching platform.
And self source was a series A investor. But I think the round was around 50 million of raise, which is gigantic from Japan's standards. And now he is a public company with close to $3 million in market cap. I love the great story. And I also see his journey. And I hear all the great stories that he tells me about you. And you have been a great business partner for him. That's great. I think recently we have been very interested in Japan. We have main investors with the core investor with you in Nudge. So he just announced a new one called Blumo in investment space. And you are the grandmaster of Japan investing.
What are the advantages of building a tech company in Japan versus other markets? I think some of my listeners may not be that familiar to the market. And what can entrepreneurs in South Asia or elsewhere learn from the entrepreneurs who have partnered with it by CVS? See, it probably is a hard market to crack because of the language barrier and the cultural barrier. But at the same time, it's a big market. It's the third largest economy in the world. But especially around enterprise software, it is the second largest market after the United States.
Let me give you some figures. It's about $280 billion on an annual spend basis, on an annual spend basis. And a lot of that is dominated by ARM-PAM legacy software that I just mentioned about when I was using it out of the Tochu. So it's a low hanging fruit. If you have a great user interface experience, you can land customers. The initial V-Ray should start with SMBs and then maybe the mid-marketing enterprise. But it's a very low hanging fruit market. And I think a peer that you back when you were at Sequoia, they entered Japan with a great product.
I think they got huge enterprise customers like Cyboration and they were in public. So if you are able to crack the market from language in a cultural perspective, you will do well in Japan. Let's create UBI, first part of call, the very master to learn from. And I think you mentioned, I think the app here story which appeared on the Tochu. S-H-H. In addition, we also see a number of portfolio companies like Caro, Internet, X-Pand to Japan.
What advice do you have for founders, A, looking to expand Japan and also considering going public on the Tochu. S-H-H. Because I think one of the interesting things about Tochu. S-H-H-H, actually, you are compared to NYSE or NASDAQ. You actually can go public at a fairly early stage in the company's life cycle. Of course, I think there are some best practices that you do have Japanese customers, but you will be the expert to share. Yep. So you're definitely right. Some US investors called the growth market in Japan, the public growth market in Japan as a series B round.
A typical company that goes public does about 10 million of AR, but it's also profitable about a million dollars of their profit, meaning slower growth in smaller companies. At the same time, the history tells us that you can go public earlier, but your market cap is not going to grow as fast because you're not spending enough cash to grow your business, right? There's closing costs to everything, so that's how I feel.
And to answer your first question about Japan entry, I think you should really hire a strong country manager that isn't purely about his or her bilingual abilities. Maybe the person might not have a Harvard physical degree or something. The guy that can the guy or gal that can actually execute is what I would really recommend. But it is challenging to be communicating with the local Japan head that doesn't speak fully in English, but at the same time, we got all kinds of tools out there, right? Like Google channels, they and all that stuff. So I think you should really focus on execution versus the ability to really communicate.
I also wanted to get you to give a landscape for our limited partners in the audience where we have quite a couple of listeners. Japan is relatively new market to them. I don't know how many of them are going to invest in Japan, but it's relatively new for the venture landscape. But you are particularly the opportunity set in Japan, which capital for someone who has not looked at the market before. Yeah, so Japan's 22 venture capital market was around 10 billion, right? And the government is emphasizing that they want to 10 accept by 27, 2027 to 100 billion.
So there's going to be a lot of cash that is going to be put into the market, which is a good thing all around because the economy size is big enough, but the innovation part is lacking. So why not put in more venture capital money in the government supportive and the multiples, which is extremely important for investors, is down and is too in the US market. Like a SaaS company multiple would be trading around 15 to 20 X, probably in 2021 figures, now trading around 5 to 6 X.
So I think it's great timing to take a look at Japan from an LP standpoint and started the low point of the market, because if you are starting from the high point of the market, you're expecting it to go higher. That's a difficult sell, right? That's great. And I would say the prior conception for Japanese soldiers, it's there and many place they stay in a job for one their whole career. But I think it's starting to change. And I don't think people recognize that we understand a little bit about the transition of the Japanese entrepreneur pool.
So I was probably a typical Japanese guy that wanted to work at a torture for life. I was there for 15 years and it wasn't a casual decision for me to leave a torture. It was a great company. It was like a family culture. There's two types of entrepreneurs that I'm looking at, right? One, the ones that are really members of public companies right now, like Samsung, VisionAll and Free, those members have really been the catalyst of growing the companies from the ground up and they are starting their own companies, right?
The second one are people that worked at Compleza Gito Chu or Mitsuyu or any big company in Japan and transferred to a tech company here like Google, Facebook, Salesforce. Those members are also great potential entrepreneurs for us to back. And when you even talk to the younger generation, they have their own sophisticated three-year map, right? Start with a big Japanese company or a US tech company, be there for three or four years, experience it, go to a startup, build a business and then start, right? Because as I mentioned, if the government is really trying to push forward entrepreneurship, there's a lot of capital there.
And then the cultural norm that you can't make mistakes in Japan is probably going to change. That's great. I wanted to say a little bit about the current economy, which is obviously going through and, and certain times, what is your advice to founders, the successful, this navigating sales and monetization? Also, we know environment where there's tech spending and cost cutting. Yeah, totally. I think the straightforward answer is burn multiple, right?
It used to just be growth, right? And in SAS, if you grew triple, triple double, you would be awarded a term sheet, right? From 10 different SAS investors, right? But you also have to look at burn multiples, right? Even that if you are sacrificing a little bit of growth, I think burn multiple is how you should play the game. And David Sacks, the famous SAS investor in the US, a famous blog about burn multiple. If you're about one X, you're a great company. If you're a two X, that's so so if you're a three X, that's a bad growth rate.
So I have been really commanding this within my portfolio companies. And they are in the ranges of one X two X burn multiple. And congrats to the entrepreneurs that actually executed this end. With a stronger market and a robust financial market, they would be awarded a term sheet with favorable terms. But if you are burning money in two months and saying that you're growing, your Indian economics doesn't make sense. That's not a good business being burn multiple is my straightforward answer. That's great.
And I also want to talk from the topic that's quite hot recently, generated AI, GPT for how are you seeing this impact the way new generations of companies are grown? I think it's a huge threat and also a huge potential. It's nothing in between. It's interesting that some outman came to Japan and met the Prime Minister, Kishil right? But generically, Japan is taking that huge innovation in a positive way to try and transform Japan.
So for SAS entrepreneurs, you should obviously embrace it and collect their API or build something related to them and super Georgia service. And I think the companies that will do well are companies or SAS companies that are a system of record that have enough data within their product set, either from a product standpoint or from a user standpoint, and utilize that data and make the experience better.
So those are the companies that's going to do well. The companies that might struggle or even become obsolete are ones that don't have data. It's not a system of record, maybe a system of engagement. But I think those will be challenging, right? Like even for an amazing public Zoom, I'm sure there's a lot of recorded data on their archives, but I think it's just for an archive not being really utilized. And if they do on D there, maybe they will be super charged. But if they don't, since it's not a system of record, it might be replaced by another party, right?
That's great. We have a segment called the minute master class where, you know, if you were to give a master class or a growth for SAS companies to found this, what would be one of the key lessons of benchmarking and leveraging industry data that you want your founders to take away? And I think it's Bobo, but multiple was another mostly part of metric that you track. So that's why we built projection AI database.
And you want to look at your ratio of sales and marketing R&D and GNA spend. And initially, since you're just trying to grow, you don't really manage that kind of balance. And you focus too much on sales and marketing spend, or there's even companies that spend too much cash on GNA, which doesn't generate any cash, right? Because there's a lot of house screening to do from a governance perspective, from a documentation perspective. I've seen several companies that we've taken a look at spend about 30% of their revenue on GNA. If it's just one year, maybe that's solid, but if that's continuing, that's a nightmare. So focus on the balance of spending in sales and marketing R&D and GNA. And for example, if you are a pure tech company catering towards engineers like Atlassian, of course, spend a lot on R&D, right? I think Atlassian spends over like 50% on R&D, right? Whereas Salesforce spends over 50% on sales and marketing because it's a sales company. So depending on your product, depending on the demographics or segment that you're targeting, use your S&M R&D wisely and take a look at our database projection AI database. And you will have great examples of that. Those are public companies, and you should not discount it because they're public. Those are like outstanding businesses that's become public and growing. So I think you should take a look at that ratio. I strongly recommend people check out the projection about AI and we might need to remind myself to sign up today. Thank you so much.
So I think we moved to the rapid fire round. I will ask the best and then you can have a short answer. What's currently your favorite genitive AI use case and tool? To be honest, I'm being overwhelmed with all the tools and I'm trying to use here and there. Chat GPT has been like golden tool. I think the ratio is 50, 50 between Google search and chat GPT right now. It's increasing. Wow, that's pretty high. If you were invited to produce a network show, what would be the title of the show and what would it be about in one line? Japan SaaS. Oh, that's great. The server exponentially. Looking back now is one skill at a software hard skill that you believe you should have learned back in your time in school or early part of a career. Pudding. That's a sort of very, yeah, a server symmetry one. If there's something that you could get in your job, just say wishing for it. One aspect of your job with this beat. Or for your construction. Oh, okay. I want to help. Probably was fundraising, but okay, this is the best. That's also great. That's the way.
What's your favorite go-to destination in SaaS Asia? Apart from Singapore? I grew up in Malaysia. SaaS. Which one? The Kuala Lumpur. Oh, wow. Okay. I see. That's great. And I think this is more for myself. So what's your favorite activity to do? Stress. Basketball. Oh, really? Okay. We should get a game in the Tokyo or Singapore. Maybe. Yeah. And a favorite book to recommend. I think it's zero to one. Period. Yeah. Yeah. That's a great one. That was a good one. And also, I think a billion dollar coach, a little Campbell. A billion dollar coach. Okay. Do you have a Japanese one to recommend? Several. I recommend the book read by Swimi. I mean, I'm in Sanjay's original CEO. Okay. Okay. Questioning your judgment. Like all the time. Why is that? Why is that? I think it's a very tactical book. So thank you. No, thank you so much. This is a great pleasure talking to you. It's been a wrap up information. I learned a lot and we have been partners and looked for the deepening of partnership. I might go two percent in Japan for not only SaaS but all things Japan. So thanks for your time. Thank you.