首页  >>  来自播客: Electrified 更新   反馈

Everyone Is Lying About Tesla and EV's ⚡️

发布时间 2024-07-19 22:59:52    来源
Welcome to Electrified, it's your host Dylan Loomis, quick shout out to my newest patron Lucas S. Thank you for choosing to support the channel. This has been on my mind lately so I wanted to take a quick second just to thank each and every one of you that has ever interacted with or tried out any one of the sponsors of the channel. It really does go a long way in ensuring that the time I spend on Electrified is viable for my family and I, so seriously in the most sincere way possible, thank you. Over the past 24 hours there has been a shocking amount of this and disinformation out there when it comes to the supposed EV mandate. So we're going to clear all of this up and talk about how it may impact Tesla.
欢迎来到Electrified,我是你的主持人Dylan Loomis。首先感谢我最新的赞助者Lucas S.,感谢你选择支持这个频道。最近我一直在想这个问题,所以我想花点时间感谢每一位与频道的赞助商互动过或试用过产品的你们。你们的支持真的帮助我能继续专注于Electrified,同时保障我的家庭生活。所以,真心感谢你们。 在过去的24小时里,关于所谓的电动车规定,出现了大量令人震惊的信息和虚假信息。今天我们就来澄清这些问题,并讨论它们可能对特斯拉的影响。

Last night at the RNC Donald Trump said I will end the EV mandate on day one saving the US auto industry from complete obliteration which is happening right now and saving US customers thousands and thousands of dollars per car. Now honestly there's a chance that not even Trump knew what specific regulation he was talking about with that statement but I'm very confident that that EV mandate is separate from the EV tax credits. These are two very different things. The regulation that Trump was likely talking about was this the new EPA emission standards that we got earlier this year.
昨晚在共和党全国委员会(RNC)上,唐纳德·特朗普说上任第一天他会终止电动车(EV)强制政策,以拯救正在被彻底摧毁的美国汽车工业,并为美国消费者每辆车节省成千上万的美元。老实说,特朗普可能自己也不清楚他所谈的具体法规是什么,但我非常相信他说的电动车强制政策是与电动车税收优惠分开的。这是两件完全不同的事情。特朗普可能谈论的法规是今年早些时候出台的新的环保局(EPA)排放标准。

An important thing to note here these emission standards are not new these have been around now since the early 2000s. The truth is referring to these new emission standards as a mandate is not accurate. These new rules encourage EV deployment but are technology neutral and don't actually require automakers to sell them. The EPA stuck to their tradition of setting performance-based standards essentially setting an emissions target or limit on how much pollution on average is allowed from the new vehicles manufacturers. So the lower the average the more changes manufacturers need to make either by improving their gasoline and diesel vehicles or by increasing sales of lower emission tech like plug-in hybrid or full be the flexibility in the standards means that we don't know for certain how many EVs manufacturers will make.
需要注意的是,这些排放标准并不是新的,从2000年代初就已经存在。实际上,将这些新的排放标准称为强制性要求是不准确的。这些新规定鼓励电动车的发展,但在技术上保持中立,并不真正要求汽车制造商一定要销售它们。环保署坚持其设定基于性能的标准的传统,基本上就是设定一个排放目标或限值,规定新车制造商的平均污染排放量。因此,平均排放量越低,制造商就需要进行更多的调整,或者通过改进其汽油和柴油车辆,或者增加低排放技术(如插电式混合动力车或纯电动车)的销售。标准中的灵活性意味着我们不确定制造商会生产多少电动车。

There's a cacophony of people out there right now that are saying the federal government is mandating that 56% of cars must be EV by 2030 and that's just not true at all. In reality that number is just a projection of how these new standards may actually play out. If manufacturers comply with the standards as EPA estimates they might we could see battery electric vehicles make up as much as 30 to 56% of sales between 2030 and 2032. Simply put there are new emission targets that do need to be hit but automakers have a lot of options on how they actually get to those numbers. Smaller cars making combustion engines more efficient plug-in hybrids fuel cells full be EV etc.
现在有很多人在说联邦政府要求到2030年56%的汽车必须是电动汽车,但这完全不是真实的。实际上,这个数字只是一个预测,表示这些新标准可能会实际产生的效果。如果制造商按照环保局的估计来遵守新标准的话,我们有可能看到到2030年到2032年之间,电池电动汽车的销售占比达到30%到56%。简单来说,确实有新的排放目标需要达到,但汽车制造商有很多方法可以实现这些目标,比如生产更小的汽车、提高燃油发动机的效率、插电式混合动力车、燃料电池车和纯电动汽车等。

Now separate from all of that which is at the federal level we can move down to the state level where there actually are some EV mandates in place. In California they've adopted the advanced clean cars to regulations which means all new passenger cars trucks and SUVs sold in California will be zero emission by 2035 and it's true that there are currently between 10 and 15 other states that have already decided to follow California's lead on this one. Could Trump come after California and some of these other states? I think anything's possible but it seems unlikely.
现在撇开联邦层面的规定不谈,我们可以看看州层面的情况,有些州已经有了一些电动车的规定。在加利福尼亚州,他们通过了先进清洁汽车2号法规,这意味着到2035年,加州销售的所有新乘用车、卡车和SUV都将是零排放的。目前确实有大约10到15个州已经决定跟随加州的步伐在这一点上。特朗普能对加州和其他一些州采取行动吗?在我看来,这种可能性是存在的,但似乎不太可能。

That's because California has had a Clean Air Act in place since 1970. The provision requires the US EPA to grant California permission to set its own clean air standards as long as the state can show that its proposed standards are at least as protective of public health and welfare as applicable federal standards and that the state needs those tighter standards to meet compelling and extraordinary conditions. I'm not a lawyer so I'm not going to go any further as I'll be waiting out of my depth. However Trump was likely talking about the new emission standards that don't really have an EV mandate and then separately at the state level where there are actual EV mandates it's not clear if Trump can actually come after those.
这是因为加利福尼亚自1970年以来一直实施《清洁空气法》。该规定要求美国环保署(EPA)允许加利福尼亚设定自己的清洁空气标准,只要该州能够证明其提出的标准至少能像适用的联邦标准一样保护公众健康和福利,并且该州需要这些更严格的标准来应对迫切和特殊的情况。我不是律师,所以我不会深入探讨,因为那样会超出我的理解范围。然而,特朗普可能谈论的是新的排放标准,这些标准实际上没有电动车(EV)要求;而在州一级确实有电动车要求,尚不清楚特朗普是否真能针对这些要求采取行动。

I also think it's somewhat ironic because any person living in the United States should actually want these new emission standards because ultimately it will mean we all get to breathe cleaner air and not only that but we get to buy more efficient vehicles with our money. But sadly because the truth gets packaged up politically into EV mandate bad then most people end up having no idea what's actually going on and they just repeat talking points that they have no idea are actually super misleading. Personally I'm going to steer way clear of saying that I think Trump would be good or bad for Tesla because it's a super nuanced conversation.
我觉得这有点讽刺,因为生活在美国的任何人其实都应该想要这些新的排放标准,因为最终这会让我们呼吸到更清洁的空气,而且还能用我们的钱买到更高效的车辆。但遗憾的是,真相常常被政治化,很多人只是觉得电动车强制标准不好,他们其实并不真正了解事实,而只是重复一些非常具有误导性的说法。至于我个人是否认为特朗普对特斯拉有利或不利,这个话题非常复杂,我不会轻易表达看法。

The truth is nobody has any idea how this is all going to unfold and if Trump wins it's likely going to be some good for Tesla and some bad and weighing it at this point is nearly impossible. However it's absolutely worth pointing out a potential risk to Tesla's margins when it comes to the inflation reduction act and specifically the tax credits both on the production side and on the consumer side. Last year on Tesla's Q2 call Zach Kirkhorn said for the IRA manufacturing incentives we provided previous guidance that we expect these to be for the course of this year in the range of 150 million to 250 million per quarter. So on the high end for the full year this number would have been around $1 billion just for the manufacturing incentives for 2023 which means that could be the number again for 2024 if not even slightly higher. As a reminder the $45 per kilowatt hour manufacturing tax credit has two parts. One part of that is $35 per kilowatt hour for domestic battery cell production and then the remaining $10 per kilowatt hour is for domestic battery pack assembly. The word has been now for a while that Tesla is splitting that $45 per kilowatt hour with Panasonic in Nevada for 2170s but Tesla would get the full credit for the 4680s made in Texas for the Cybertruck. And then if Tesla is still assembling the cells from CATL for the powerwall and megapack they would get $10 per kilowatt hour for all of that. So that's where the roughly $200 million per quarter would be coming from. And you also have to factor in the tax credit on the consumer side so just for 2023 in the US there were 1.2 million EVs sold, Tesla had 55% of that market. Just for quick back of the napkin math we'll call that 650,000 sales for Tesla in the US last year. Now let's say that 50% of those sales actually qualified for the IRA tax credit. Multiply that figure by 7500 per sale gives us $2.4 billion for the year divided by 4 quarters, roughly $600 million per quarter. So again this is not analysis but just some rough numbers to get us in the ballpark. Tesla's total gross profit for 2023 was $17.6 billion. About $1 billion of that would be from the manufacturing tax credit and then you can call it roughly 2.5 billion from the consumer tax credit. Doing the math that means in 2023 roughly 20% of Tesla's gross profit actually came from IRA tax credits. On X Elon said again a surprising number of people think Tesla survives on subsidies that's true of our competitors but not of Tesla. It's absolutely true that Tesla does not need these subsidies Tesla will survive without them but to say that taking them away would be beneficial to Tesla I think is a stretch. In that scenario Tesla either has to lower the prices of their vehicles and give up some margin or keep the prices where they are and likely sell less vehicles.
其实,没人知道事情将如何发展。如果特朗普赢得选举,对特斯拉可能有些好处也有些坏处,目前几乎无法权衡其中的利弊。不过,值得指出的是,当涉及《通货膨胀削减法》时,特斯拉的利润率可能面临潜在风险,特别是生产和消费两方面的税收抵免。 去年,在特斯拉的第二季度电话会议上,Zach Kirkhorn提到,我们之前预计IRA(通货膨胀削减法)的制造激励将在今年每季度大约在1.5亿到2.5亿美元之间。也就是说,全年高端的数额将约为10亿美元,仅是2023年的制造激励,这意味着2024年这个数字可能还会更高。值得一提的是,每千瓦时45美元的制造税收抵免分为两部分。一部分是每千瓦时35美元的国内电池生产,另一部分是每千瓦时10美元的国内电池组装。据了解,特斯拉在内华达州与松下公司平分这每千瓦时45美元的税收抵免,但在德州生产用于Cybertruck的4680电池时,特斯拉将获得全部抵免。另外,如果特斯拉仍在组装来自宁德时代的电池组用于储能和大容量电池组,他们也会获得每千瓦时10美元的抵免。这就是大约每季度2亿美元收入的来源。 此外,还得考虑消费者端的税收抵免。2023年,美国卖出了120万辆电动车,其中特斯拉占比55%。简单计算,特斯拉去年在美国的销量大约是65万辆。假设其中50%的销售实际符合IRA税收抵免规定,每辆车的7500美元税收抵免一年总计24亿美元,按4个季度平均,每季度大约6亿美元。因此,这不是详细的分析,只是一些粗略的数字来估算大致范围。特斯拉2023年的总毛利润为176亿美元,其中约10亿美元来自制造税收抵免,大约25亿美元来自消费者税收抵免。简单计算,2023年大约有20%的毛利润实际上来自于这些税收抵免。 埃隆在推特上表示,许多人认为特斯拉依靠补贴生存,这对我们的竞争对手可能是真的,但对特斯拉来说并不是。的确,特斯拉不需要这些补贴也能生存,但说取消这些补贴对特斯拉有益,我认为有些牵强。在那种情况下,特斯拉要么降低车辆价格牺牲一些利润,要么保持现有价格但可能销售量减少。

And I understand why people make the argument it's because the competition needs those subsidies more than Tesla. That's also very true. In case you haven't noticed Tesla is still really only competing against itself so Tesla's profitability in my opinion is a lot more important than all of the competition making even less money without those subsidies on EVs. Just in case this all wasn't confusing enough already you know those regulatory credits that Tesla earns and it's why people talk about Tesla's auto gross margin X credits well those specifically are separate from everything we were just talking about. Just be careful out there because a lot of people are throwing around the words mandates and credits but the question is what exactly are they talking about. We all know politicians are excellent at making promises they don't actually keep but for what it's worth Trump did say that he was open to Chinese EV makers actually building their cars in the US. He also said if those Chinese EV makers set up shop in Mexico and then plan to import them into the US that Trump would slap them with up to 200% tariffs. But important to note Trump apparently is open to Chinese EV makers making their cars in the US using US labor. How realistic is that latter point though I would say not very. Just so everybody knows there have already been some legal attempts from auto makers and energy players trying to repeal these new emission standards. Then when you layer in the recent chevron ruling that is actually supposed to limit some of the power of organizations like the EPA and NHTSA.
我理解为什么有些人认为竞争对手比特斯拉更需要这些补贴。这确实是事实。如果你还没有注意到,特斯拉目前实际上只是和自己竞争,所以从我个人的观点来看,特斯拉的盈利能力比没有这些电动汽车补贴的其他竞争对手盈利更少的重要得多。顺便说一句,那些人经常讨论的特斯拉通过监管积分获得的汽车毛利率和我们刚刚谈论的内容是分开的。要小心,因为很多人随意使用“强制规定”和“积分”这些术语,但问题是他们具体在说什么。我们都知道,政客们很擅长做出他们实际上不会兑现的承诺。不过,值得一提的是,特朗普表示他愿意让中国的电动汽车制造商在美国建厂。他还说,如果这些中国电动汽车制造商在墨西哥设厂然后计划将车进口到美国,特朗普会对他们征收高达200%的关税。但重要的是,特朗普显然愿意让中国电动汽车制造商在美国使用美国劳动力制造汽车。然而,这最后一点的现实性如何呢?我认为不太实际。为了让大家了解一下,汽车制造商和能源公司已经进行了一些法律尝试,试图废除这些新的排放标准。此外,最近的雪佛龙裁决实际上意在限制像EPA(环境保护署)和NHTSA(国家公路交通安全管理局)这样的机构的一些权力。

All of that to say there is a fair amount of uncertainty out there it may linger for the next one to two years so I just want everybody to be aware. Some of you have been asking me when energy sage was going to be available in your state well the time has finally come as energy sage has now expanded to all 50 states. In their press release they said for over a decade energy sage has been at the forefront of promoting clean energy and energy saving solutions providing a platform for consumers to comparison shop and save on rooftop solar. It has evolved to provide energy storage heat pumps, EV chargers and community solar. Energy sage makes it easy to transition to clean energy. Consumers can easily request multiple high quality quotes from vetted and accredited solar HVAC and electrical installers. The process is free, simple and frictionless through its in-depth resources and unbiased support. I've talked to people at this company multiple times as I was looking into solar for our home. Just remember anything clean energy if you have questions you want somebody to talk to you want somebody to help you find people in your specific area energy sage is the place to go. No energy sage does not sponsor the channel but I did ask them for an affiliate link at the very least because I plan to keep talking about it for a while as I found it to be helpful so it'll always be linked below if you want to check them out.
总而言之,当前存在相当大的不确定性,可能会持续一到两年,所以我希望大家能够注意到这一点。有些人问我Energy Sage什么时候会在你们所在的州上线,现在这个时刻终于来了,因为Energy Sage已经扩展到所有50个州。在他们的新闻发布中提到,Energy Sage十多年来一直走在推广清洁能源和节能解决方案的前沿,提供一个让消费者比较购物并在屋顶太阳能上节省开支的平台。它已经发展为提供能量存储、热泵、电动汽车充电器和社区太阳能。Energy Sage使过渡到清洁能源变得轻而易举。消费者可以轻松地从经过审核和认证的太阳能、暖通空调和电气安装商那里请求多个高质量的报价。通过其深入的资源和无偏见的支持,这一过程是免费、简单且无摩擦的。我在考虑为我们家安装太阳能时,多次和这家公司的人交谈。记住,如果你有关于清洁能源的问题,想找人谈谈,或者需要在你的特定区域内找到相关的人员,Energy Sage是一个不错的去处。不,Energy Sage并没有赞助这个频道,但我至少向他们申请了一个联盟链接,因为我打算持续谈论它一段时间,因为我发现它很有帮助,所以如果你想了解更多,链接会始终放在下面。

Late last night cyber security company crowd strike pushed an update that was apparently defective and many many different companies and their windows systems were down. Elon said we just deleted crowd strike from all of our systems so no rollouts at all. There are reports that Tesla halted some production lines in Texas and Nevada due to the global IT outage. Tesla told its staff this morning it's currently experiencing an outage with windows hosts servers laptops and manufacturing devices where users are seeing a blue screen on their devices. Elon replied to Alex saying unfortunately many of our suppliers and logistics companies use it and replying to a post about this story Elon said does anyone ever get fired anymore. Replying to Satya Nadella Elon said this gave a seizure to the automotive supply chain. Hopefully this turns out to be a short lived and small disruption for Tesla and many of its suppliers but we'll keep an eye on it in the days ahead.
昨晚深夜,网络安全公司CrowdStrike推出了一个更新,但该更新显然存在缺陷,导致许多公司及其Windows系统瘫痪。埃隆说,我们已经从所有系统中删除了CrowdStrike,所以没有任何推送更新。据报道,由于全球范围的IT中断,特斯拉在德克萨斯和内华达的部分生产线已经停止。特斯拉今早告诉员工,目前其Windows主机、服务器、笔记本电脑和制造设备都出现了故障,用户看到的都是蓝屏。埃隆回复Alex时说,不幸的是,我们的很多供应商和物流公司都在使用这个系统。针对这个消息的一则帖子,埃隆还说,现在还有人会被解雇吗?埃隆在回复Satya Nadella时提到,这给汽车供应链带来了麻烦。希望这次中断对特斯拉及其众多供应商来说只是短暂且小范围的影响,但我们会在接下来的日子里继续关注这个问题。

Sawyer shared the promotions that Tesla is currently running in the US and you may see Tesla did bring back 1.99% Model Y financing if you take delivery by September 30th. Tesla also sent out an update saying to enable additional Model 3 performance and Model X all wheel drive vehicles to qualify for the tax credit we're offering complimentary paint options for Model 3 performance and the seating layout options for the Model X all wheel drive. For a limited time customers can choose one of these options for free when FSD is added to your order. Additionally all trim levels of the Model S and X in the US were increased by $2,000 which yes is an interesting choice because all indications have been pointing to Model S and X demand being relatively weak. This is the US page for the Model S but just for you Canadians the Model S and X have been bumped up in price. In Canada the Model X went up $3,000 for both trims and then for the S the all wheel drive went up $6,000 and the plaid went up $2,000. And to show you for the Model 3 performance typically the paint colors still are an upcharge but if you add FSD to your order then for now all paint color options are included with FSD. And for the Model X again when you add FSD all seating layout options including the 6 and 7 cedars are also included to keep these vehicles eligible for the credit.
Sawyer 分享了特斯拉目前在美国的促销活动。你可能会注意到,如果在9月30日前提车,特斯拉确实重新推出了1.99%的Model Y 贷款利率。此外,特斯拉还发布了一则更新,为了让更多的Model 3 Performance和Model X全轮驱动车型符合税收优惠条件,我们现在提供免费的Model 3 Performance车漆选项和Model X全轮驱动车型的座椅布局选项。在限时内,客户在订单中添加FSD(全自动驾驶)时,可以免费选择这些选项之一。 另外,美国市场上所有版本的Model S和Model X价格都上涨了2000美元。这个决定比较有趣,因为所有迹象表明Model S和X的需求相对较弱。这是Model S的美国页面,但对于加拿大用户来说,Model S和X的价格也有所上涨。在加拿大,Model X两种版本的价格都上涨了3000美元,而Model S全轮驱动版本上涨了6000美元,Plaid版本上涨了2000美元。 同时,为了让你更清楚,通常情况下Model 3 Performance的车漆颜色依旧需要额外付费,但如果你在订单中添加FSD,那么现在所有车漆颜色选项都包含在内。而对于Model X,当你添加FSD时,所有座椅布局选项,包括六座和七座,也都包含在内,以确保这些车辆能符合税收优惠条件。

UK developer Harmony Energy has begun construction on France's biggest battery storage facility. The 100 megawatt so roughly 300 to 400 megawatt hour project will use Tesla's Megapack and be able to power 170,000 homes for two hours. This facility is on the site of an old power station that burnt fossil fuels for more than 30 years. Construction has already started with a battery system due to be connected to the grid in the summer of 2025 and ready to be fully operational by the end of next year. This project could be up to a 100 megapack order for Tesla. According to an internal email it shows that Anaheim police officers want to be the first in the country to have law enforcement branded cyber trucks. It said I spoke with the chief yesterday and we still want to be the first police agency to have a cyber truck if anyone can make that happen I know it's you. They said the cyber truck could be used at parades or community events to start conversations with the public though he noted the high price point of the armor like vehicle. Speaking of the cyber truck there was some video footage of meek mill showing off his and I just wanted to say if I were to have a cyber truck this would be the aesthetic I go for some form of matte black with black wheels.
英国开发商Harmony Energy已经开始建设法国最大的电池储能设施。这个100兆瓦(大约300到400兆瓦时)的项目将使用特斯拉的Megapack电池,能够为17万户家庭提供两小时的用电。这座设施位于一个运行超过30年的燃化石燃料的旧发电站的原址上。建设工作已经开始,电池系统计划于2025年夏季接入电网,并在明年底前全面投入运营。这个项目可能会需要多达100个Megapack电池。 根据一封内部邮件显示,阿纳海姆警察局希望成为全美国首个配备赛博卡车(Cybertruck)的执法机构。邮件中提到,我昨天与警察局长谈过,我们仍然希望成为第一个拥有赛博卡车的警察机构,如果有人能实现这点,我相信就是你。他们表示,赛博卡车可以在游行或社区活动中使用,以便与公众进行交流,尽管他也指出这种装甲车辆价格不菲。 说到赛博卡车,有一段视频显示说唱歌手Meek Mill展示了他的赛博卡车。我想说,如果我拥有一辆赛博卡车,我会选择亚光黑色车身配黑色轮毂的这个风格。

Keeping tabs on the health of the overall auto market so far in 2024 car repossessions are up 23% compared with the same period last year reposs started ticking up last year and have now surpassed pre pandemic levels up 14% compared to the first half of 2019 between inflation higher credit card debt more expensive housing interest rates for new cars being over 7% and over 11% for used cars we kind of knew this was going to happen still. Ants paid $191 million in civil penalties for failing to meet us fuel economy requirements for 2019 and 2020 and they still owe another $460 million in outstanding penalties the COO of Ford just told auto car that their plans to go all electric in Europe by 2030 were too ambitious he said Ford maintaining a flexible powertrain offering is crucial and a new multi energy platform currently in development for European cars will be vital in case you haven't picked up on it already all of these CEOs saying that we're going to give our consumers freedom of choice what it really means is that the demand for their electric vehicles is not at all where they were expecting it to be and that they're also losing more money on fully electric vehicles than they were anticipating originally there's still plenty of disinformation out there about this Elon clarified this note is false I have not pledged anything to anyone this in response to Elon giving $45 million per month to a Trump super PAC that is not true he said I did create a PAC that's focused on supporting candidates who favor a meritocracy and personal freedom but funding to date has been far below that level there are so many people saying Elon's giving millions of dollars to Trump a guy who hates electric vehicles none of that is accurate Elon just said he has not given money to Trump and it's not that Trump hates EVs in that speech last night he actually said he supports EVs again though it's the mandate whatever he actually meant that he does not support Tesla stock closed the day at $239.20 down 4.02 percent while the Nasdaq was down 0.81 percent it was a lower volume day for Tesla trading about 22 million shares below the average volume the past 30 days hope you guys have a wonderful and a safe weekend please like the video if you did you can find me on x linked below and a huge thank you to all of my patreon supporters.
2024年到目前为止,汽车市场健康状况监测显示,汽车被收回的数量比去年同期上升了23%。收回数量从去年开始增多,现在已经超过了疫情前的水平,比2019年上半年增长了14%。通胀、更高的信用卡债务、更昂贵的住房和新车贷款利率超过7%、二手车贷款利率超过11%等因素,使我们早已预见这种情况的发生。 此外,安特公司因未能达到2019年和2020年的美国燃油经济性要求,被罚款1.91亿美元,他们还欠另外4.6亿美元的罚款。 福特公司的首席运营官(COO)最近告诉《汽车杂志》,他们计划到2030年在欧洲实现全电动化的目标过于雄心勃勃。他表示,福特需要保持灵活的动力系统供应,新正在开发的多能源平台对于欧洲汽车市场至关重要。如果你还没明白,所有这些CEO说要给消费者选择自由,实际上是因为电动车的需求并没有达到他们的预期,并且他们在全电动车上的亏损比最初预计的要多得多。 关于Elon Musk的一些不实信息仍在流传。Elon澄清说:“这个消息是假的,我没有向任何人承诺过什么。”这是针对一则谣言的回应,称Elon每月向一个特朗普的超级政治行动委员会(PAC)捐款4500万美元。他说:“我确实创建了一个PAC,旨在支持那些赞成精英统治和个人自由的候选人,但目前的资助远低于这个水平。” 有很多人说Elon在给特朗普捐款,但这并不准确。Elon明确表示他并没有给特朗普捐钱,而且特朗普也并不讨厌电动车。在昨晚的演讲中,特朗普实际上表示他支持电动车,但他反对的是电动车的强制推广。 特斯拉的股票当天以239.20美元收盘,下降了4.02%,而纳斯达克指数下降了0.81%。当天的交易量低于特斯拉过去30天的平均交易量,约2200万股。 希望大家度过一个美好且安全的周末,如果你喜欢这个视频,请点赞。你可以在下面的链接中找到我的联系方式,非常感谢所有我的Patreon支持者。



function setTranscriptHeight() { const transcriptDiv = document.querySelector('.transcript'); const rect = transcriptDiv.getBoundingClientRect(); const tranHeight = window.innerHeight - rect.top - 10; transcriptDiv.style.height = tranHeight + 'px'; if (false) { console.log('window.innerHeight', window.innerHeight); console.log('rect.top', rect.top); console.log('tranHeight', tranHeight); console.log('.transcript', document.querySelector('.transcript').getBoundingClientRect()) //console.log('.video', document.querySelector('.video').getBoundingClientRect()) console.log('.container', document.querySelector('.container').getBoundingClientRect()) } if (isMobileDevice()) { const videoDiv = document.querySelector('.video'); const videoRect = videoDiv.getBoundingClientRect(); videoDiv.style.position = 'fixed'; transcriptDiv.style.paddingTop = videoRect.bottom+'px'; } const videoDiv = document.querySelector('.video'); videoDiv.style.height = parseInt(videoDiv.getBoundingClientRect().width*390/640)+'px'; console.log('videoDiv', videoDiv.getBoundingClientRect()); console.log('videoDiv.style.height', videoDiv.style.height); } window.onload = function() { setTranscriptHeight(); }; if (!isMobileDevice()){ window.addEventListener('resize', setTranscriptHeight); }